This email was sent by Sonny Poozhikala to the last KCCNA EC. Now where is this spineless creature(spoozhi), when the current NC decided to accept adopted children. So it is clear that for Sonny Poozhikala and Sheins ENDOGAMY is only a political tool to fool the pavam kanaya makkal.
--- On Wed, 4/21/10, Sonny Poozhikala wrote:
From: Sonny Poozhikala
Subject: Fwd: FW: Proposed Constitution Amendments
To: nellaconsulting@sbcglobal.net, georgenella4kccna@gmail.com, sublink@msn.com, "John Thachet" , spoozhi@gmail.com, "Roy Puthenkalam" , "Jobi Valiyaputhenpurail" , "Robin Molakattu" , "Jose palakunnel" , SIBYPOOZHIKALA813@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 2:27 PM
Dear KCCNA EC, NC and Knanaya community:
A concerned NC member forwarded the above documents to me and requested for my opinion. I went through the Proposed constitutional amendments thoroughly and spoke to a few NC members to see if they understand the implications of some of the proposed amendments. Not surprisingly, many did not go through it, and those who did, had little clue, and was quite surprised as to what some leaders are up to.
Since the proposed amendments encompass 35 separate amendments and contains 17 pages, it is a tedious and futile exercise to discuss in detail the pros and cons of each and every proposed amendment. Hence, i will concentrate on four proposals that will have long term, serious impact on KCCNA as an organization
1. The proposal to allow adopted children to participate in KCCNA conventions.
Our convention is meant to be an endogamous convention (unlike some of the spineless leaders we have, I have no problem to use the word "endogamous"). Allowing adopted children simply corrupt the nature of our convention. If we allow adopted children to participate this time around, next time it definitely will get expanded to include half-knas, and thereafter Syro-Malabarians. In fact half-knas' claim will become more legitimate because, with half knas, at least one parent can be vouched as a kna. If a kna boy or girl court an adopted convention participant, who would be responsible for that ?- the same organization which stands for marriage within the community. Hence, it will be hypocriticall for KCCNA to adopt such a position, and, there will be no difference between KCCNA and KANA.
--- On Wed, 4/21/10, Sonny Poozhikala wrote:
From: Sonny Poozhikala
Subject: Fwd: FW: Proposed Constitution Amendments
To: nellaconsulting@sbcglobal.net, georgenella4kccna@gmail.com, sublink@msn.com, "John Thachet" , spoozhi@gmail.com, "Roy Puthenkalam" , "Jobi Valiyaputhenpurail" , "Robin Molakattu" , "Jose palakunnel" , SIBYPOOZHIKALA813@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 2:27 PM
Dear KCCNA EC, NC and Knanaya community:
A concerned NC member forwarded the above documents to me and requested for my opinion. I went through the Proposed constitutional amendments thoroughly and spoke to a few NC members to see if they understand the implications of some of the proposed amendments. Not surprisingly, many did not go through it, and those who did, had little clue, and was quite surprised as to what some leaders are up to.
Since the proposed amendments encompass 35 separate amendments and contains 17 pages, it is a tedious and futile exercise to discuss in detail the pros and cons of each and every proposed amendment. Hence, i will concentrate on four proposals that will have long term, serious impact on KCCNA as an organization
1. The proposal to allow adopted children to participate in KCCNA conventions.
Our convention is meant to be an endogamous convention (unlike some of the spineless leaders we have, I have no problem to use the word "endogamous"). Allowing adopted children simply corrupt the nature of our convention. If we allow adopted children to participate this time around, next time it definitely will get expanded to include half-knas, and thereafter Syro-Malabarians. In fact half-knas' claim will become more legitimate because, with half knas, at least one parent can be vouched as a kna. If a kna boy or girl court an adopted convention participant, who would be responsible for that ?- the same organization which stands for marriage within the community. Hence, it will be hypocriticall for KCCNA to adopt such a position, and, there will be no difference between KCCNA and KANA.
If these people have guts, they should resign especially sheins. He is a massive failiure. He lost his bid against the adopted kids. Now apologize to the previous EC for plotting and trying to attack them on the name of adopted kids issue. YOU ARE TRULY DR>SHAME
ReplyDeleteDR.SHAME....That's All ??? He is a Rotten Egg in the knanaya community....there is no doubt about it..
ReplyDeletewe neeed an explanation from current EC as what forced them to dilute our stands. Atelast mission have their limits. But KCCNA membership is defined and if somebody cannot attend the convention because of babysitting of their adopted kids,let them not participate in the convention. KCCNA should not dilute our stands.
ReplyDeleteHey guys, there are lot of truth will be revealed soon and will start believing North American kna.
ReplyDeleteKccna Exe, Siby, Joji and Noel, Knanaya community still believe that your are not part of the crooks M9 team . Now you have the opportunity get out and stay way from Shiens. If not, we believe ( Knanaya community) you are part of the crooks kccna administration and working against church & missions. It’s very important to recognize them (crooks M9 team) yourself before they Ruin Your Reputation in North American Knanaya community.
It is very important that you make a choice that you will not regret later!
There are lot of truth will be revealed soon!!
Even though I support church, I dont support KCCNA 's latest decisión abt adopted kids. If KCCNA can not maintain endogamy, why we need a convention under KCCNA? Why cant we do under church?Atleast we dont have to deal with these poli-crooks.
ReplyDeleteThe KCCNA Executive committee and the NC who apporved the adopted kids as guests of their parents must show courage to explain their reasoning for the decision.Remember, 'Right decisions may not always popular'. Stand up with your concience, not just with popularity. Most Humane decision KCCNA ever made.
ReplyDeleteWhat is a guest member??What are the limitations they have in a convention???
ReplyDeleteThey can not attend any competions
ReplyDeleteI think we only seen the tip of iceberg
ReplyDeletei hope a half kna would also go to court and ask to participate in the conventions . endogamy is not a practical soulution and we will only loose our members . why dont we include the chidren of knas married out side our community too . its a legitimate claim and hope someone will have the guts to challenge it in the court . rome has already legitimised it any ways .
ReplyDeleteif we like it or not its coming . i heard some people are going to file a suit at the court .
if that happens all the jabbling in the name of endogamy will be a history
eda viddi.......rome has nothing to do with endogamy.......endogamy is a practice by the community and rome's business is with the faith. endogamy is not about faith........evanokke entha parayunathu ennu poolum ariyilla........
ReplyDelete